Can t enter the top ten without a championship? Point guard history ranking, Paul is not as good as Curry and Westbrook, but he is still missing the top ten

Recently, former NBA player Perkins gave his ranking of the top ten point guards in history, among which Curry and Westbrook are both on the list, but Paul, known as the "God of Point Guards", is not only inferior to Curry and Westbrook, but also missed the top ten point guards in history, which naturally caused considerable controversy.

Perkins' list of top ten point guards in history are Magic, Curry, Big O, Stockton, Thomas, Payton, Westbrook, Nash, Kidd, and Bob Cousey. Overall, this list is relatively reasonable, but Paul is really puzzled by many people. There is no reason why Paul was excluded from the top ten point guards in history. Because Paul has never won the championship in his career and has never won the MVP, and the top point guards in history have either achieved success or won the MVP, and their career achievements are very high. By comparison, Paul seems to be a bit inferior.

Authentic, Paul's lack of a championship and MVP is indeed a big deduction, which greatly affects his historical status, but Paul's career achievements are actually quite high, otherwise he would not have been called the God of Point Guard. Paul has played for 20 seasons, and his career total assists and steals have ranked second in history, second only to Stockton.

In addition, Paul has won a total of 5 assists, 6 steals, 12 All-Stars, 11 Best Team selections, and 9 Best Defensive Team selections, 6 of which are the Best Defensive Team selections. As a point guard, Paul has a very strong team-leading ability. It can be said that he has his own system. Every time he changes team, he can greatly improve the team's record and winning rate.

In addition to not having a championship and MVP, Paul can be said to be one of the most perfect traditional point guards. Moreover, Stockton also has no championship or MVP, but its historical status is very high. Although Westbrook and Nash both have MVPs, they do not have championships, and their honors in other aspects are not as good as Paul. Their historical status may not be higher than Paul.

If you use the main reference standard for the championship, Paul's historical status will indeed be discounted, but overall, Paul is indeed a historical point guard, and it is also biased to not be able to enter the top ten.