The performance of the G3 Pacers is like a replica of the Thunder, but the latter s substitute advantage has become a shortcoming

G3, the Pacers' performance is like a replica of the Thunder. They almost use the opponent's defensive strength and quality to continuously accumulate the capital to win.

In this game, turnover comparison: Thunder 17 VS Pacers 13.

1: Alexander of the Thunder, has reached 24 points for the first time since he was 30+ in the first two games. The Pacers' defensive strategy has not changed much. They still mainly use Nemhard as the main defender, but some changes are that the time spent on Shepard defending is increased, which ensures the intensity of the defense. At the same time, appropriately double-team Alexander. Of course, Alexander in this game was unable to create a foul by his opponent, and he only had 6 free throws.

2: Thunder's substitute vitality and contribution are insufficient. G2 surprise Wiggins played for nearly 10 minutes and 0 points. Harten had 18 minutes, 4 points and 3 rebounds. Caruso 32 minutes, 8 minutes. The Thunder's substitute has always been their advantage, but this game has become a shortcoming.

3: Restricting Halliburton is not effective. Halliburton increased the number of throws after breakouts in G3. This offensive method has changed to achieve certain results, but more importantly, he no longer waited until the last quarter to start offensive mode like he did in the previous two games. Halliburton's offensive period and shooting percentage directly affect the winning and losing trend of the game.

Halliburton scored 22 points, 9 rebounds and 11 assists, which was completely his game rhythm and feeling.