7 points! Manchester United s ultimate summer window operation review: The forward line is upgraded, the midfield is regretful but the future is promising

Transfer window is now closed, which means it's time to do one thing: look back at Manchester United's summer transfer operations. All summer, social media has been discussing: Is Manchester United doing well? Have they met the needs of the team? Is this a successful transfer window? Or failed? In this post, we will try to rate it objectively, which is always a difficult thing in the extreme Manchester United fan base.

Solve the goal of goal drought this summer

Manchester United management's goal this summer is very clear: to solve the team's main problem - goal drought. So Mbermo, Cunya and Seshko joined, while Hoylen, Rashford, Sancho, Garnacho and Anthony left.

Manchester United's signing combination is excellent. Signing two versatile Premier League attackers who adapt to the Amorin system and who can adapt to other systems even if Amorin leaves office is an excellent deal. Considering the market conditions, their transfer fees are also quite reasonable.

In addition to Mbermo and Cunya, the Red Devils also signed one of the world's best young centers, Xieschko. This approach of combining imminent combat power with young geniuses to relieve the latter's pressure is very good. The influence of Mbermo and Cunya is already obvious, and they both seem to be smart signing.

Overall, the Red Devils seem to have solved the offensive problem for years to come, which is exactly what management intends.

Goalkeeper problem

Most fans know that Manchester United needs a goalkeeper before the transfer window opens. Onana and Baindir's performance was unstable at best.

However, the club seemed to have been struggling to choose the young LaMant or the experienced plug-and-play Emiliano Martinez. It's very difficult to deal with this situation for a team with four goalkeepers (especially in the World Cup year) who only plays on a single front.

Although signing LaMant showed an intention to solve the goalkeeper's problem in the long run, this issue may have caused United to lose at least one point in the league and led them to be out of the League Cup.

However, the late signing (which made LaManto not have the chance to participate in the preseason) and the hesitation in choosing a young or experienced goalkeeper are the reasons for the lower score. However, they should be praised for their hope of solving the problem for a long time and for not panicing and making the wrong contract.

Not reinforced midfielder

Present on social media and you will see how enthusiastic the midfielder issue is being talked about. There are also many opinions pointing out that the players Manchester United is interested in are of different types (the most commonly mentioned names are Baleba, Stiller and Walton).

Many people say that different target types indicate indecision and lack of coherent planning, but should not be viewed so. Under the management of Insli, Manchester United adopted the strategy of "absorbing as long as talents are available". In addition, it is normal and expected that different target types are different. Eriksen has left the team, Casemiro will leave next summer, and Bruno Fernandez is also likely to leave the team.

So, what Manchester United needs is different types of players, not a specific type, because they are looking for replacements for three players with different characteristics. It has always made me feel strange that people see different target types as problems rather than as a strategy of “absorbing available talents first and signing the remaining puzzles next January or summer”.

It is also worthy of being credited that they did not make a wrong signing because of panic, otherwise United would not be able to sign them again when the right players appeared.

Player Sale

Sale Work went on a little later in this transfer window, and Manchester United didn't start recovering funds until late August. There was a lot of talk on social media about Garnacho's transfer fee, but Manchester United did a good job in this matter, winning acceptable fees for a player who was abandoned by the head coach, did not want to stay in the team and only liked a certain club.

It is a victory to be able to recover any funds for Anthony. Manchester United also retains a 50% second transfer share clause when Real Betis sells him in the future, meaning the Red Devils can still earn a considerable income if the Brazilian player performs well in Spain.

' Failure to recover any money from Sancho and Rashford (which could still bring about £30m if Barcelona chooses to activate the buyout clause) is disappointing, but clearing out about £600,000 per week's wage expenditures still relieves the pressure on the wage bill and provides a huge room for United to continue to invest in January (if they will).

From the perspective of Manchester United, handling Hoylen is a very cost-effective deal. It is a great deal for a player who is obviously not in the club plan to receive a loan fee and reach an easy mandatory buyout clause with an acceptable fee.

Overall, the sale could have been faster and the funds could have been recovered could have been more money, but none of these players were signed by the management team. They have tried their best to handle the "bad cards" they took over.

Final rating: 7/10

Offensive problem was resolved and goalkeeper problem was also handled. Failure to reinforcing the midfield was a turnover, but the intention was clear and the wrong type of player was not signed, which was refreshing after the panic signings in the past few transfer windows.

Players can certainly do better in selling jobs, but considering the players' preferences, salary and the fact that the world knows that Manchester United needs funds, the recycled fees are pretty good.

It looks like the club has multiple plans ready for execution, which is normal for a reconstruction process like Manchester United, which does not require only one player.

After this transfer window, it feels like Manchester United can send a competitive team to the court and have a basic framework for a team that can grow and run-in together..

Next January and summer will be the time for midfield reconstruction. If Manchester United can introduce players of the same quality as Yoro, Cunya, Mbermo, De Ligt, and Seschko for the midfield, they will become better.