Frick was dissatisfied with the penalty and put it aside. What do you think of using Lewandowski like this? Next time, use a stool to guard the door.

Flick, after losing, Frick told the media: Whenever the scene falls into a balance of power, the referee's penalty will always be beneficial to Inter Milan!

He may be referring to Dumfries stepping on Martin and sending a tie assist, and Inter Milan's third goal was fouled first.

However, whether the dispute is decided by the referee, you are the first person responsible for ruining the good game of our team.

Lewandowski was able to play before the game. Even if he was not the starter, he missed opportunities many times and the team repeatedly won corner kicks. Why didn’t he think of Lewandowski in advance? But when the team's lead was about to end, he did not replace the defensive player. Instead, he thought of Lewandowski, and did he regard him as "the best central defender in Europe"?

The team was immediately tied. Is this your backup plan? Well, then you can see real kung fu in overtime! But unfortunately, Lewandowski was in no state at all when he appeared at this time. Not only did he miss a header of less than one meter, but his subsequent two headers were also fruitless. So what's the use of changing him?

It can be seen that the scene at that time had already shorted the experienced coach!

In addition, I have to say that Schensny is still a second-rate goalkeeper when he is about to retire (it is nicer and accurate first-class). He scored 7 goals in two rounds and made almost no valuable saves. It is an example of this goalkeeper being completely compared to a stool.

The following picture is like Sommer with God's help!