Losing 1-2 to Van Persie, Mourinho angrily criticized the referee after the game! Is the tactic really outdated?

Mourinho and Fenerbahce's Champions League path were once again hit hard at the last moment. Facing Feyenoord, who was coached by Van Persie, they lost 1-2 away, and the way they lost was particularly heartbreaking. In the 91st minute of the game, Mousa, a 1.76-meter tall player, actually completed the final kill with a header!

The game was quite stalemate. Feyenoord took the lead with his home advantage, and Fenerbahce also scored a goal (Mr. Mourinho strongly protested). The game was about to end 1-1, but at the critical moment, there was a problem with Fenerbahce's defense. Facing Feyenoord, he hurled the ball into the penalty area at the last moment, they failed to defend against the flexible Mousa and were grabbed by him and headed the ball to score. Mourinho's face turned pale on the sidelines. If he could not turn the tables in the second round, this would be the second consecutive year that he led the team to fall in the UEFA Champions League qualifiers. Where is the

? The data is a bit ugly:

Fenerbahce has big defenders such as Skriniar and Seyunju. Last season, he was one of the teams with the least goals conceded in the Turkish Super League. But in this game, the opponent scored 2 shots in three shots, and was finally smashed by a small man's header, which showed obvious loopholes in the high-altitude defense. The ball possession rate of the game was the best (56%), and the shots were only pitiful 2 times. Mourinho's team's best defensive counterattack and set-piece offense (scored a lot of goals with these two moves last season), basically failed to play this game. The newly bought striker Duran has no effect on the bench. In the qualifying round last year, they played one more person in overtime and were eliminated by Lille. This year, he lost away in the first leg of the away game, and it is extremely difficult to turn the tables

Old question: Is Mourinho's tactics still effective? After the game, Mourinho unexpectedly pointed his finger at the referee again, believing that the blown-out goal was a misjudgment. But he avoided several key questions: Why did Duran, who was in good condition, sit on the bench? Why did the air defense deployment not focus on Moussa? Why can't the team hold on at the last moment?

Fenebache's defense line is very strong, but modern football's defense requirements have long been more than just squatting behind. In this game, Feyenoord has stronger control in the midfield and can continue to create threats through crosses from the wing. Once Mourinho's team is suppressed in the backcourt and lacks effective high-pressing and the ability to pass the ball smoothly from the backcourt, the scene will be very passive.

In the past, Mourinho could win by relying on solid defense and personal flash of stars. But in this game, core striker Ennecili was seen dead, and the team created only one-two of the opportunity that the opponent had. When the move "putting a bus + waiting for the stars to explode" is not effective, the team seems to be unable to come up with other effective offensive methods.

Some people say that Mourinho's tactics are outdated. In fact, it may not be that the tactics themselves are completely ineffective, but that football is changing and opponents are improving. Fenerbahce has invested a lot and his goal is to Champions League, but in the qualifying match for two consecutive years, Mourinho's "pragmatic" football is indeed facing a huge test. When he returned to home in the second round, he and his team had to come up with something different.