Moon Sports > Football > The goal was criticized for being defeated by five, Villa issued a statement to question the penalty

The goal was criticized for being defeated by five, Villa issued a statement to question the penalty

Football

Sports Weekly All Media Original

In the 38th round of the Premier League, Aston Villa lost to Manchester United 0-2 away. Villa goalkeeper Emiliano Martinez was dyed red in stoppage time in the first half. Villa scored one goal in the second half, but the goal was blown away by referee Bramore. Manchester United then scored 2 goals, Villa lost 2 goals and finally ranked 6th in the Premier League, failing to qualify for the Champions League.

Vera was very dissatisfied with the goal being blown away. In the 73rd minute of this game, Rodgers cut off the ball from Manchester United goalkeeper Bayander and shot into the net, but the goal was invalid. The official explanation given by the Premier League for this penalty is that "Before Rodgers obtained the ball, Bayandel had already controlled the ball. The referee had blown the whistle before the goal, and VAR could not intervene." However, Villa believes that Bayandel had lost control of the ball, and Rodgers did not make a foul, and this ball should be judged as valid. Villa coach Emery found the referee theory after the game, but the penalty could no longer be changed.

Villa official also issued a statement after the game, expressing his concerns about the referee selection process."

"In view of the importance of this game, the club believes that the referee committee should have appointed a more experienced referee. Among the 10 referees participating in Premier League law enforcement today, Mr. Bramore is the second least experienced referee."

"He invalidated Morgan Rodgers' goal, but this goal could have helped Villa get it with 17 minutes left. 1-0 lead. This penalty is one of the main reasons why the club failed to qualify for the Champions League. "

" According to the law enforcement standards established this season, this decision to blow the whistle too early is obviously inconsistent with the current referee guidelines. VAR exists precisely to ensure that such situations can be checked as they deserve. Unfortunately, this technology has not played its due role. "

"This result cannot be changed, but we believe it is necessary to examine the referee selection mechanism to ensure that high-risk matches receive due attention in referee arrangements, and to ensure that VAR technology can truly play its role."

Related Posts

Links