The top 10 of IFFHS history triggered controversy! Messi reaches the top, Ronaldo unexpectedly, South America and Europe open 55

When the International Federation of Football History and Statistics (IFFHS) threw out this "Top 10 Best in History" list, the entire football circle was caught in a discussion about "authority". Some people shouted, "Messi deserves his title to be king", some people "break the defense and open the microphone" for Ronaldo's fourth place, and some people even asked "Why Beckenbauer lost to Ronaldo." But behind this seemingly cold ranking of this list, there is the most intense collision of football history - what kind of rule should we use to measure the football legend that has spanned a hundred years? Is the World Cup champion the only Bible for measuring the King of Football? Ronaldo's honor book can be regarded as the ultimate fantasy of a data madman - 5 Golden Globe Awards, 5 FIFA Player of the Year, 4 European Golden Boot Awards, and the football history scorer. He can still play alone in the Saudi League at the age of 40. But think about the "cruelty" of this list: it not only competes with personal honors, but also takes into account the background of the times, team achievements, and historical influence. Behind Ronaldo, "Grand Slam legends" such as Cruyff and Beckenbauer, the former defines modern football with the revolution of "all offense and all defense", while the latter is the god of the three identities of players, coaches and managers. Although Ronaldo's European Cup is hard-core, he has always been a breath of a sigh of relief on the ultimate stage of the World Cup.

Messi reached the top because of the 8 Golden Ball Awards, the World Cup + the Americas Cup, making him the only "phenomenal football king" who can compete with Pele and Maradona. Bailey and Maradona represent the eternal classics of football. Pele's three World Cups and 1,283 goals (including informal matches) are legends that cannot be carried by data, while Maradona's "Hand of God + Five consecutive players" is the ultimate concreteization of football's charm. The most interesting part of the

list is the equally divided between South America (5 people) and Europe (5 people). The confrontation between Argentina (Messi, Maradona), Brazil (Belle, Ronaldo, Ronaldo) and European powerhouses is essentially a genetic war between technical and tactical flows.

The ranking of South American players is generally high, reflecting IFFHS's preference for "individual heroism". Messi's dribbling, Maradona's breakthrough, and Ronaldo's speed are all the most dazzling individual items in the statistics table. European players (Bakenbauer, Cruyff, Zidane) win in their "system contribution" - they are not only the core of the court, but also the inventors of football tactics.

IFFHS's list is like a mirror, reflecting the values ​​of the football world: some worship data, some believe in feelings, and some insist on "World Cup first". But perhaps this is the charm of football - when Ronaldo continues to set a record in the Saudi league, when Messi brings global traffic to the American League, and when the stories of Pele and Maradona are repeatedly circulated, we will finally understand: historical rankings are just topics of conversation after dinner, and those moments that make us cry are the eternal currency of football. Interactive topic: If you can change the binding ranking and change the "unsatisfaction" in your heart, what choice would you make? Leave a message in the comment area!